SAHRDC Reports

Human Rights & Human Rights Instruments in India

1.International Human Rights Instruments and their Application in India
The Chart of Ratification of International Instruments, provided by the United Nations, should ideally form the corpus of international customary law, applicable in all democratic countries. Once an instrument is ratified a signatory is bound to bring in laws that conform to United Nations standards. Even if these instruments are not legally binding, they are morally compelling.

SAHRDC Reports

Refugee Protection in India

South Asian refugees who have fled to India face serious problems in their daily lives. From forcible repatriation to starvation, refugees find themselves on the edge, clawing for mere survival. India has provided shelter to these refugees for centuries for both geopolitical and socioeconomic reasons. Political upheaval occurring in unstable countries bordering India often created political upheavals, forcing citizens to seek refuge elsewhere. Additionally, ethnic and religious persecution forced minorities to join similar peoples in India’s multi-ethnic and multilingual society. Better opportunities to start afresh and improved living conditions also contributed to India’s appeal.

SAHRDC Reports

Return of the Maoists: Midnight knocks and extrajudicial killings in Nepal

Return of the Maoists: Midnight Knocks and Extra-Judicial Killings in Nepal

 1. PREFACE
South Asia Human Rights Documentation Centre (SAHRDC) has been receiving reports of human rights abuses by Nepalese Police and Maoist cadres in the Rapti region of mid-western Nepal for a little over six months. “The People’s War” declared by the Samyukta Jana Morcha (SJM) (United Peoples Front), a radical communist group, in mid-western Nepal in November 1995 provided the Nepalese Police with ample opportunity to violate basic norms of human rights and fundamental freedoms. The situation deteriorated when the SJM cadres attacked two police stations on 13 February 1996 to herald the second phase of the “People’s War”. There have been reports of flagrant human rights abuses including arbitrary arrests, detention, extrajudicial killings and disappearances.

SAHRDC Reports

The Situation of Burmese Refugees in Asia: Special Focus on India

The South Asia Human Rights Documentation Centre (SAHRDC) has closely been monitoring the situation of the Burmese refugees in Asia with special focus on India.

Hundreds of pro-democracy activists took shelter in border states of North east India. The staunch support of pro-democracy movement by former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi made students in Yangoon to seek help from India. However, after five years diplomatic stand-off, Prime Minister Narashima Rao sent Mr J N Dixit to Yangoon in April 1993 to mend fences with the State Law and Order Restoration Council (SLORC). The Deputy Foreign Minister of Burma also visited New Delhi early 1994 and exerted pressure upon New Delhi to stop anti-SLORC activities..

SAHRDC Reports

The State of Refugees under the Protection of UNHCR in New Delhi

The following study conducted by the South Asia Human Rights Documentation Centre (SAHRDC) seeks to examine the services offered by the New Delhi office of the United Nations High Commissioner of Refugees (UNHCR) to the refugee population in the Union Territory of Delhi, India. This examination is done keeping in view the provisions of the 1951 United Nations Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, the 1967 Protocol, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), the UNHCR guidelines as well as other related International instruments.

SAHRDC Reports

The Stateless Chakmas and Hajongs of the Indian State of Arunachal Pradesh: A study of systematic repression

A study of systematic repression

While statelessness has long been recognized as an important problem in international law, the desire of states to exercise control over stateless persons in their jurisdictions has prevented effective action. The 1954 Convention Relating to the Status of Stateless Persons has attracted only thirty-seven signatories, and a mere fifteen states have ratified the 1961 Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness. The indifference of national governments and the inaction of the international community has led to a large number of persons who are particularly vulnerable to oppression because they lack the protection afforded by rights of citizenship. The stateless are “denied the vehicle for access to fundamental rights, access to protection and access to expression as person[s] under the law”.

Scroll to Top