SAHRDC Reports

Armed Forces Special Powers Act: A study in National Security tyranny

Armed Forces Special Powers Act:  A study in National Security tyranny

1. INTRODUCTION

The Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act of 1958 (AFSPA) is one of the more draconian legislations that the Indian Parliament has passed in its 45 years of Parliamentary history. Under this Act, all security forces are given unrestricted and unaccounted power to carry out their operations, once an area is declared disturbed. Even a non-commissioned officer is granted the right to shoot to kill based on mere suspicion that it is necessary to do so in order to “maintain the public order”.

SAHRDC Reports

Confronting the Violence Committed by Armed Opposition Groups

Human rights groups have limited their role to monitoring and protesting human rights violations committed by state actors.1  With the emergence of armed opposition groups “such as the Sendero Luminoso in Peru2” and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) in Sri Lanka3 that murder, torture, and destroy civil society in their respective regions, human rights entities must question whether they should broaden their mandate to include abuses committed by such groups.  Focusing on the context of India, this article: (1) develops arguments encouraging human rights groups to critique abuses perpetrated by armed opposition groups; (2) suggests potential problems that may be encountered in making such criticisms; and (3) raises some reasons for caution by human rights organizations that condemn the actions of armed opposition groups.

SAHRDC Reports

Country Report on the Refugee Situation in India

1. INTRODUCTION

Though India has not ratified the 1951 United Nations (UN) and 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, it provides shelter to over 300,000 refugees from neighboring countries. There are over 50,000 Jumma refugees from the Chittagong Hill Tracts of Bangladesh sheltered in Tripura State of India, over 70,000 Sri Lankan Tamil refugees living in Indian State of Tamilnadu and about 121,143 Tibetan refugees. They are under the protection of the Government of India.

SAHRDC Reports

Human Rights & Human Rights Instruments in India

1.International Human Rights Instruments and their Application in India
The Chart of Ratification of International Instruments, provided by the United Nations, should ideally form the corpus of international customary law, applicable in all democratic countries. Once an instrument is ratified a signatory is bound to bring in laws that conform to United Nations standards. Even if these instruments are not legally binding, they are morally compelling.

SAHRDC Reports

Refugee Protection in India

South Asian refugees who have fled to India face serious problems in their daily lives. From forcible repatriation to starvation, refugees find themselves on the edge, clawing for mere survival. India has provided shelter to these refugees for centuries for both geopolitical and socioeconomic reasons. Political upheaval occurring in unstable countries bordering India often created political upheavals, forcing citizens to seek refuge elsewhere. Additionally, ethnic and religious persecution forced minorities to join similar peoples in India’s multi-ethnic and multilingual society. Better opportunities to start afresh and improved living conditions also contributed to India’s appeal.

SAHRDC Reports

Return of the Maoists: Midnight knocks and extrajudicial killings in Nepal

Return of the Maoists: Midnight Knocks and Extra-Judicial Killings in Nepal

 1. PREFACE
South Asia Human Rights Documentation Centre (SAHRDC) has been receiving reports of human rights abuses by Nepalese Police and Maoist cadres in the Rapti region of mid-western Nepal for a little over six months. “The People’s War” declared by the Samyukta Jana Morcha (SJM) (United Peoples Front), a radical communist group, in mid-western Nepal in November 1995 provided the Nepalese Police with ample opportunity to violate basic norms of human rights and fundamental freedoms. The situation deteriorated when the SJM cadres attacked two police stations on 13 February 1996 to herald the second phase of the “People’s War”. There have been reports of flagrant human rights abuses including arbitrary arrests, detention, extrajudicial killings and disappearances.

Scroll to Top